Court Judgments & Orders · न्यायालयीन निर्णय
Maharashtra State Excise case law — Supreme Court, Bombay HC, tribunals. Includes the uploaded Court Orders.
167judgments
New this week: 5
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
31 May 2017
Maharashtra Retail Liquordealers' ... vs The Commissioner State Excise & Anr on 31 May, 2017
Analysis pending · Full text available / विश्लेषण प्रलंबित
dgm 1 901-wp-32-1999-jt.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 32 OF 1999
Maharashtra Retail Liquor Dealers'
Association, an Association of retail
liqu...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
23 Jan 2017
M/S Lahoree Deluxe Restaurant And Bar ... vs State Of Maharashtra, Through ... on 23 January, 2017
Analysis pending · Full text available / विश्लेषण प्रलंबित
1 wp54.17
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,
NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 54 OF 2017
M/s. Lahoree Deluxe Restaurant & Bar,
through its authorised person
Shri Manoj s/o Jainarayan...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
04 Oct 2016
M/S. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 4 October, 2016
Analysis pending · Full text available / विश्लेषण प्रलंबित
WP8572.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 8572 OF 2015
M/s. Ghodawat Energy Pvt. Ltd., a registered ]
company having its office at B-Gate No.351 ]
to...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
12 Apr 2016
Alka Anil Chaudhari vs The State Of Maharashtra And Others on 12 April, 2016
Alka Anil Chaudhari, a business proprietor, filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and multiple excise officials, including the Collector and District Superintendent of State Excise, challenging certain excise department act...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
07 Jan 2016
Chandrapur District Liquor Dealers Association v. State of Maharashtra
License holders challenged the State's declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district effective 1 April 2015 under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. They contended that the decision was arbitrary, violative of Article 14, based on defective com...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
07 Jan 2016
Ganesh Narayan Jivtode v. State of Maharashtra
Multiple petitions challenging the State's declaration of Chandrapur district as a "dry district" effective 1 April 2015, which cancelled all liquor licenses. Petitioners (license holders and local authorities) contend the prohibition order...
Bombay High Court
· Nagpur
★ Landmark
07 Jan 2016
Rajendrakumar S/O Shailendrakumar Dixit vs The State Of Maharashtra
Jt.wp1360.15
Liquor licensees and elected representatives challenged the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district, arguing the decision violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, lacks Chandrapur-specific data, and was based on a flawed committ...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
07 Jan 2016
Tadoba Paryatak Hotel Seva Sanghatna v. State of Maharashtra
Jt.wp1360.15
License holders and district associations challenged the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district under the Prohibition Act. The court examined the validity of the Deotale Committee Report, the data used in the decision, and whether Arti...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
07 Jan 2016
Vijay Narayan Pallewar and Others v. State of Maharashtra
2004 (3) BCR 371; 1993 (1) Mah.L.J. 685
Liquor licensees challenged declaration of Chandrapur district as alcohol-free/dry under Section 139(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949. Held: State has authority to withdraw concessions granted under the Act and declare any district dry...
Bombay High Court
· Nagpur
★ Landmark
07 Jan 2016
Vilas S/O Dharmaji Nerkar and Others vs. State of Maharashtra
2016 (1) Mah.L.J.
Liquor licensees challenge the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, on grounds of violation of Articles 14 and 21. The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) examines the State's authority under...
Bombay High Court
· Nagpur
24 Feb 2015
M/s Vidarbha Liquor Corporation v. The State of Maharashtra
Licensee challenged retrospective recovery of supervision charges following 6th wage revision applied from 1.1.2006. Court held that Section 58A vests power in State to recover supervision costs; license conditions and undertakings already...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
08 Apr 2014
Indian Hotels And Restaurant vs Union Of India on 8 April, 2014
The Indian Hotels and Restaurant Association and Vishwavihar Bar & Restaurant filed a writ petition against the Union of India, the Ministry of Finance, the Central Board of Excise and Customs, the Commissioner of Service Tax, the Commissio...
Supreme Court
15 Mar 2013
Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 March, 2013
Analysis pending · Full text available / विश्लेषण प्रलंबित
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (CRL.) NO. 50 OF 2012
Niranjan Hemchandra Sashittal
and another ... Petitioners
Versus
State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
J U D G M E N...
Supreme Court
13 Dec 2012
Manohar vs State Of Maharashtra & Anr on 13 December, 2012
Analysis pending · Full text available / विश्लेषण प्रलंबित
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9095 OF 2012
(Arising out of SLP(C) No.7529 of 2009)
Manohar s/o Manikrao Anchule ... Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra &...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
30 Aug 2012
Smt. Shantabai Baban Muluk v. Smt. Asha Janardhan Chaskar
High Court quashed Minister's revisional order allowing re-polling on a Gram Sabha resolution banning liquor sale. Court held that under BPA Sections 138–139 and the 2008 Gram Sabha closure order, once a valid, unanimous Gram Sabha resoluti...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
13 Aug 2012
Proprietor Shri Atul Virendrakumar v. Hon'ble Minister, State Excise
Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 278 and 314 of 2012 in Writ Petition No. 3440 of 2011
High Court upheld rejection of FL-III liquor licence application in residential housing colony where residents, police reports, and statutory authorities consistently opposed grant due to public nuisance, safety concerns for women and child...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
13 Aug 2012
Proprietor Shri Atul Virendrakumar vs Hon'Ble Minister, State Excise Department
<UNKNOWN>
High Court upheld rejection of FL-III foreign liquor licence for hotel in residential housing colony despite Minister's revisional order granting it. Court held that police objections based on public nuisance, resident opposition, proximity...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
31 Jan 2012
Balu Siddhu Bhosale Since Deceased vs The State Of Maharashtra & Ors on 31 January, 2012
A writ petition filed by Balu Siddhu Bhosale (deceased, represented by his legal heirs) against the State of Maharashtra and others. The judgment text provided contains only the case caption, party details, and bench composition dated 31 Ja...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
11 Aug 2011
Jitendra S/O Manindranath Bose v. The State of Maharashtra
2005 (3) All MR 810
Full Bench resolved conflicting Division Bench views on whether privilege licence fees are refundable when business is stopped by court order. Held: licensee is not entitled to refund of privilege fees when prevented from carrying on busine...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
06 May 2011
Karkhana Ltd v. State of Maharashtra
Consolidated writ petitions by distilleries and alcohol manufacturers challenging State Excise Department actions regarding licensing, regulation, and compliance with Maharashtra excise law. Court addresses validity of excise regulations, c...