Back
Court Judgment
Bombay High Court
15 Dec 2020
Suresh Gulabrao Choudhari vs The State Of Maharashtra, State Excise, ... on 15 December, 2020
| Case Number | Writ Petition No. 1930 of 2020 |
| Bench | Principal Seat |
| Tags | state of maharashtra FL-III restaurant licence state excise authority administrative law licence cancellation/suspension |
Summary & Ratio Decidendi
Four restaurant owners in Nagpur district challenged State Excise decisions affecting their liquor licences through consolidated writ petitions. The judgment text provided contains only case captions, party details, and court information without substantive findings on the merits; the full oral judgment on the legal issues and relief granted is not included in the truncated text.
मराठी सारांश
नागपूर जिल्ह्यातील चार रेस्टॉरंट मालकांनी राज्य उत्पादन शुल्क विभागाच्या त्यांच्या दारू परवानग्या संबंधित निर्णयांविरुद्ध एकत्रित रिट याचिका दाखल केल्या. प्रदान केलेला न्यायनिर्णय मजकूर केवळ केसचे शीर्षक, पक्षांची तपशीले आणि न्यायालयीन माहिती असून गुणविषयक निर्णयावरील न्यायालयाचे निर्णय आणि दिलेली मदत यांचा समावेश नाही.
Analysis pending · Full text available
विश्लेषण प्रलंबित — पूर्ण मजकूर खाली उपलब्ध आहे. The AI-generated summary and rule-linking for this judgment is queued; the full text is below.
विश्लेषण प्रलंबित — पूर्ण मजकूर खाली उपलब्ध आहे. The AI-generated summary and rule-linking for this judgment is queued; the full text is below.
Full Text
1 wp 1930-2020.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1930 of 2020 PETITIONER: Keshav Mahadeo Mohane, Aged about 66 years, Occ. : Business, under the name and style of "Punam Restaurant" at House No. 25/3/1, Plot No.1, KANDRI, Tah. Parshiohi, Dist. Nagpur. Vs. RESPONDENTS : 1] The State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Mantralaya, MUMBAI; through its Secretary, 2] The Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 3] The District Committee (State Excise), through its Ex-Officio Chairman - respondent No.2 Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 4] The Superintendent, State Excise, NAGPUR WITH Writ Petition No. 1896 of 2020 PETITIONER: M/s Dewoo Shine Restaurant, through its Proprietor - Shri Gajanan Sakharam Tidke, aged about 45 years, Occ. : Business at House No. 247, Ward-2, NIMKHEDA, Tah. Mouda, Dist. Nagpur. Vs. RESPONDENTS : 1] The State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Mantralaya, MUMBAI; through its Secretary, 2] The Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 3] The District Committee (State Excise), through its Ex-Officio Chairman - respondent No.2 Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR ::: Uploaded on - 17/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 17/12/2020 22:59:15 ::: 2 wp 1930-2020.odt 4] The Superintendent, State Excise, NAGPUR WITH Writ Petition No. 1926 of 2020 PETITIONER: Suresh Gulabrao Choudhari, Aged about 58 years, Occ. : Business, under the name and style of "Choudhari Restaurant" at House No. 142 (Old No.14) Ward No. 76, HUDKESHWAR, Tah. & Dist. Nagpur. Vs. RESPONDENTS : 1] The State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Mantralaya, MUMBAI; through its Secretary, 2] The Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 3] The District Committee (State Excise), through its Ex-Officio Chairman - respondent No.2 Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 4] The Superintendent, State Excise, NAGPUR WITH WRIT PETITION No.1928/2020 PETITIONER : Naresh Deorao Gaidhane, Aged about 50 years, Occ. : Business, under the name and style of "The Galaxy Restaurant" at House No. 1008, Plots No.1 & 2, Kh. No. 89, Ward No. 1, SIHORA (KANHAN), Tarsa Road, Tah. Parshiohi, Dist. Nagpur. Vs. RESPONDENTS : 1] The State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Mantralaya, MUMBAI; through its Secretary, 2] The Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR ::: Uploaded on - 17/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 17/12/2020 22:59:15 ::: 3 wp 1930-2020.odt 3] The District Committee (State Excise), through its Ex-Officio Chairman - respondent No.2 Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 4] The Superintendent, State Excise, NAGPUR Mr. S.G. Jagtap with Mr. Sayaji S. Jagtap, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Amit Chutke, AGP for the respondents. CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT