Back
Court Judgment
Bombay High Court
15 Dec 2020
Naresh Deorao Gaidhane vs The State Of Maharashtra, State Excise, ... on 15 December, 2020
| Case Number | Writ Petition No. 1930 of 2020 |
| Bench | Principal Seat |
| Tags | state of maharashtra restaurant licence excise cancellation/suspension writ petition State Excise authority Nagpur district |
Summary & Ratio Decidendi
Four restaurant proprietors challenged the cancellation/suspension of their restaurant licences by the State Excise authority. The judgment text provided contains only the case caption, party details, and counsel information, with no substantive holding on the merits. The disposition of the petitions and the court's reasoning cannot be determined from the text supplied.
मराठी सारांश
चार रेस्तोरांच्या मालकांनी राज्य उत्पाद शुल्क प्राधिकाराकडून त्यांच्या रेस्तोरां परवानग्या रद्द किंवा निलंबित केल्याविरुद्ध याचिका केली होती. दिलेल्या न्यायनिर्णय मजकुरात केवळ केस कॅप्शन, पक्षांचे तपशील आणि वकीलांची माहिती आहे, गुणावरील कोणतेही मूळ निर्णय नाही. याचिकांचा निर्णय आणि न्यायालयाचे कारण पुरविलेल्या मजकुरातून निश्चित केले जाऊ शकत नाहीत.
Analysis pending · Full text available
विश्लेषण प्रलंबित — पूर्ण मजकूर खाली उपलब्ध आहे. The AI-generated summary and rule-linking for this judgment is queued; the full text is below.
विश्लेषण प्रलंबित — पूर्ण मजकूर खाली उपलब्ध आहे. The AI-generated summary and rule-linking for this judgment is queued; the full text is below.
Full Text
1 wp 1930-2020.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR Writ Petition No. 1930 of 2020 PETITIONER: Keshav Mahadeo Mohane, Aged about 66 years, Occ. : Business, under the name and style of "Punam Restaurant" at House No. 25/3/1, Plot No.1, KANDRI, Tah. Parshiohi, Dist. Nagpur. Vs. RESPONDENTS : 1] The State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Mantralaya, MUMBAI; through its Secretary, 2] The Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 3] The District Committee (State Excise), through its Ex-Officio Chairman - respondent No.2 Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 4] The Superintendent, State Excise, NAGPUR WITH Writ Petition No. 1896 of 2020 PETITIONER: M/s Dewoo Shine Restaurant, through its Proprietor - Shri Gajanan Sakharam Tidke, aged about 45 years, Occ. : Business at House No. 247, Ward-2, NIMKHEDA, Tah. Mouda, Dist. Nagpur. Vs. RESPONDENTS : 1] The State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Mantralaya, MUMBAI; through its Secretary, 2] The Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 3] The District Committee (State Excise), through its Ex-Officio Chairman - respondent No.2 Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR ::: Uploaded on - 17/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 17/12/2020 22:59:19 ::: 2 wp 1930-2020.odt 4] The Superintendent, State Excise, NAGPUR WITH Writ Petition No. 1926 of 2020 PETITIONER: Suresh Gulabrao Choudhari, Aged about 58 years, Occ. : Business, under the name and style of "Choudhari Restaurant" at House No. 142 (Old No.14) Ward No. 76, HUDKESHWAR, Tah. & Dist. Nagpur. Vs. RESPONDENTS : 1] The State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Mantralaya, MUMBAI; through its Secretary, 2] The Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 3] The District Committee (State Excise), through its Ex-Officio Chairman - respondent No.2 Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 4] The Superintendent, State Excise, NAGPUR WITH WRIT PETITION No.1928/2020 PETITIONER : Naresh Deorao Gaidhane, Aged about 50 years, Occ. : Business, under the name and style of "The Galaxy Restaurant" at House No. 1008, Plots No.1 & 2, Kh. No. 89, Ward No. 1, SIHORA (KANHAN), Tarsa Road, Tah. Parshiohi, Dist. Nagpur. Vs. RESPONDENTS : 1] The State of Maharashtra, State Excise, Mantralaya, MUMBAI; through its Secretary, 2] The Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR ::: Uploaded on - 17/12/2020 ::: Downloaded on - 17/12/2020 22:59:19 ::: 3 wp 1930-2020.odt 3] The District Committee (State Excise), through its Ex-Officio Chairman - respondent No.2 Collector, State Excise, NAGPUR 4] The Superintendent, State Excise, NAGPUR Mr. S.G. Jagtap with Mr. Sayaji S. Jagtap, Advocate for petitioners. Mr. Amit Chutke, AGP for the respondents. CORAM : MANISH PITALE, J. DATE : DECEMBER 15, 2020 ORAL JUDGMENT