Back
Court Judgment
Bombay High Court
09 Mar 2010
Shri Deepak S/O. Assaram Deosinghani vs // on 9 March, 2010
| Bench | Principal Seat |
| Tags | state of maharashtra excise license writ petition state excise authority |
Summary & Ratio Decidendi
Seven business persons filed a writ petition challenging decisions of the Maharashtra Prohibition and State Excise Department and related excise authorities. The petition was heard by the Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) on 9 March 2010. The judgment text provided does not contain substantive holdings on the merits of the excise dispute, consisting only of the case caption and parties' identification.
मराठी सारांश
सातजण व्यावसायिकांनी महाराष्ट्र निषेध आणि राज्य उत्पादन विभाग आणि संबंधित उत्पादन अधिकारीच्या निर्णयांना आव्हान देऊन रिट याचिका दाखल केली. याचिका बॉम्बे हाই कोर्ट (नागपूर खंड) यांनी 9 मार्च 2010 रोजी सुनावणी केली. प्रदान केलेला निर्णय मजकूर केवळ प्रकरण शीर्षक आणि पक्षांची ओळख दर्शवतो, अदालत आदेशाचे कोणतेही स्पष्ट कारण नसून.
Analysis pending · Full text available
विश्लेषण प्रलंबित — पूर्ण मजकूर खाली उपलब्ध आहे. The AI-generated summary and rule-linking for this judgment is queued; the full text is below.
विश्लेषण प्रलंबित — पूर्ण मजकूर खाली उपलब्ध आहे. The AI-generated summary and rule-linking for this judgment is queued; the full text is below.
Full Text
WP 1076/2002 1 Judgment IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.1076 OF 2002 1. Shri Deepak S/o. Assaram Deosinghani, aged about 44 yers, Occu.: Business, R/o. 42, 43, Rajeev Nagar, Somalwada, Nagpur. 2. Shri Umesh S/o. Shankarrao Kolhapure, aged about 50 years, Occu.: Business, R/o. Police Line, Takli, Nagpur. 3. Shri S.J. Sarkar, aged about 55 years, Occu.: Business, R/o. Abhyankar Nagar, Nagpur. 4. Smt. Shantibai Jiwan Dhanwangade, aged about 62 years, Occu.: Business, R/o. Hingna Road, Nagpur. 5. Shri Gopichand J. Rai, aged about 64 years, Occu.: Business, R/o. Karnal Bagh, Ganeshpeth, Nagpur. 6. Shri Ashok S/o. Assaram Deosinghani, R/o. 42, 43, Rajeev Nagar, Somalwada, Nagpur. 7. Smt. Annu W/o. Rajmohan Sood, R/o. 40, Occu.: Business, R/o. Police Line Takli, Nagpur. ....PETITIONERS. // VERSUS // 1. The State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Department of Prohibition and State Excise, Mantralaya, Mumbai. ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 15:41:26 ::: WP 1076/2002 2 Judgment 2. The Commissioner of Prohibition and State Excise, 2nd Floor, Old Custom House, Mumbai - 400 023. 3. The Collector, Nagpur, having its office at Civil Lines, Nagpur. 4. The Superintendent, State Excise, Civil Lines, Nagpur. ....RESPONDENTS. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shri K.N.Shukul, Advocate h/f. Shri S.P.Dharmadhikari, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri D.B.Patel, A.G.P. for Respondents No.1 to 3. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : R.C. CHAVAN, J. DATED : MARCH 09, 2010. ORAL JUDGMENT.