Back
Court Judgment
Gujarat High Court
07 Feb 2022
Suresh K. Sajnani vs Director Of Prohibition And Excise ... on 7 February, 2022
Analysis pending · Full text available
विश्लेषण प्रलंबित — पूर्ण मजकूर खाली उपलब्ध आहे. The AI-generated summary and rule-linking for this judgment is queued; the full text is below.
विश्लेषण प्रलंबित — पूर्ण मजकूर खाली उपलब्ध आहे. The AI-generated summary and rule-linking for this judgment is queued; the full text is below.
Full Text
Suresh K. Sajnani vs Director Of Prohibition And Excise ... on 7 February, 2022 Author: Vaibhavi D. Nanavati Bench: Vaibhavi D. Nanavati C/SCA/53/2022 ORDER DATED: 07/02/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 53 of 2022 ===================================================== SURESH K. SAJNANI Versus DIRECTOR OF PROHIBITION AND EXCISE DEPARTMENT ===================================================== Appearance: MR S M DAVE(11268) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 SHIVAM D PARIKH(9477) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 MR. ISHAN JOSHI, AGP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2 ===================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI Date : 07/02/2022 ORAL ORDER 1. Mr. Shivam M. Dave, the learned counsel appearing for the writ-applicant states that the writ-applicant is constrained to approach this Court, in view of the fact that the application for renewal of health permit to possess and use foreign liquor in the State of Gujarat issued in favour of the writ-applicant bearing Health Permit No. 201443252, despite several representations was not considered by the respondent authorities. In view of above, the writ-applicant approaches this court with the following reliefs: "(a) To direct the respondent authorities to renew the Health permit to possess and use foreign liquor in the State of Gujarat for personal use under Section 64 of the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953; (b) To direct the respondent authorities to consider the application made by the petitioners for renewal Page 1 of 3 Downloaded on : Wed Feb 09 20:46:36 IST 2022 C/SCA/53/2022 ORDER DATED: 07/02/2022 the Health permit to possess and use foreign liquor in the State of Gujarat for personal use under Section 64 of the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953; (c) To grant extension of the petitioners Health permit to possess and use foreign liquor in the State of Gujarat for personal use under Section 64 of the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953; (d) Any other and further relief, which is just and proper, may kindly be granted as may be deemed expedient by this Hon'ble Court in the facts and circumstances of the case. (e) Award cost of the present petition." 2. This Court issued Notice on 17.01.2022 making it returnable on 07.02.2022. 3. Mr. Ishan Joshi, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondent-State produced a communication dated 28.10.2021, which is the internal communication by the respondent no.2 to the respondent no.1 stating that the respondent no.2 is not in receipt of any application as stated by the writ-applicant. 4. Mr. Ishan Joshi, the learned AGP, under the instructions, candidly submitted that if the writ-applicant filed an appropriate application to the respondent no.2, the said application would be considered by the respondent no.2 authority, in accordance with law. 5. Mr. Shivam Dave, the learned counsel submitted that the writ-applicant is ready and willing to submit/prefer an Page 2 of 3 Downloaded on : Wed Feb 09 20:46:36 IST 2022 C/SCA/53/2022 ORDER DATED: 07/02/2022 application before the respondent no.2. Mr. Dave, the learned counsel further submitted that, the respondent no.2 may be directed to decide the said application expeditiously. 6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties. 7. Without going into the merits of the matter, it is appropriate to direct the writ-applicant to file an application before the respondent no.2, in view of the statement made by Mr. Ishan Joshi, the learned AGP appearing for the respondent authority. It is further directed that if an application is made by the writ-applicant to the respondent no.2, the respondent no.2 shall decide the same as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of the receipt of such application. 8. In view of above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, the present writ-application stands disposed of. It is, however, kept open for the writ-applicant to approach this Court in case of any difficulty. (VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J) Pradhyuman Page 3 of 3 Downloaded on : Wed Feb 09 20:46:36 IST 2022