Link copied!

Court Judgments & Orders · न्यायालयीन निर्णय

Maharashtra State Excise case law — Supreme Court, Bombay HC, tribunals. Includes the uploaded Court Orders.

167judgments New this week: 5
Showing 1–5 of 5
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat 13 Nov 2019

Multiple Petitioners v. State of Maharashtra (Hotel Radhika & Others)

2019 (173) 1.wp.3150-17
Multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging liquor license cancellations and excise administrative actions affecting foreign liquor and country liquor shops in Nagpur, Bhandara, Washim and Amravati districts. Bench considered validity...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat 10 Jan 2018

Arvind Kanha Naik vs The State Of Maha. Through Principal ... on 10 January, 2018

The Bombay High Court consolidated 19 writ petitions filed by country liquor shop licence holders challenging the State's rejection of their licence renewal applications for the 2017-18 financial year. The petitioners contended that the Sta...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat 10 Jan 2018

M/S K.K. Traders Through Proprietor, ... vs State Of Maha. Through Joint Secretary, ... on 10 January, 2018

The court consolidated 18 writ petitions filed by liquor licence holders challenging State Excise Department actions affecting their licences. The judgment addresses procedural and substantive issues regarding country liquor (CL/III) and fo...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat 10 Jan 2018

Vinodkumar Kundanlal Jaiswal vs The State Of Maha. Through Principal ... on 10 January, 2018

Multiple petitions from excise licence holders and traders challenged state excise department actions. The judgment addresses the consolidation of 19 related writ petitions concerning country liquor shop licence (CL/III) holders and wholesa...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat ★ Landmark 12 Feb 1974

Bombay Cycle And Motor Agency Ltd. v. Bhagwanprasad Ramragubir Pandey

(1974)76BOMLR612
Vehicle seized and confiscated under Bombay Prohibition Act (Sections 90, 66, 99) in criminal proceedings against hirer without hearing the hire-purchase owner. High Court held that owner must receive notice and opportunity of hearing befor...
Link copied to clipboard!
Ask MyExcise AI MyExcise AI