Link copied!

Court Judgments & Orders · न्यायालयीन निर्णय

Maharashtra State Excise case law — Supreme Court, Bombay HC, tribunals. Includes the uploaded Court Orders.

167judgments New this week: 5
Showing 1–12 of 12
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat 13 Nov 2019

S.K. Pant & Others v. State of Maharashtra & Others

<UNKNOWN>
Multiple writ petitions challenging cancellation/refusal of foreign liquor (FL) and country liquor (CL) licenses by excise authorities on distance-based grounds and structural requirements. The petitioners disputed the mandatory application...
Bombay High Court · Nagpur 13 Nov 2019

Hotel Jaiswal Wine Bar v. State of Maharashtra

Multiple liquor license holders challenged enforcement orders denying or cancelling foreign liquor and country liquor retail licenses based on distance restrictions from schools and educational institutions under Maharashtra excise policy....
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat 13 Nov 2019

Nandlal Narumal Sugwani and Others v. State of Maharashtra

Multiple bar, restaurant, and liquor shop proprietors challenged excise license cancellations and distance requirements imposed under Maharashtra excise law. The judgment addresses the validity of excise orders affecting foreign liquor and...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat 13 Nov 2019

Multiple Petitioners v. State of Maharashtra (Hotel Radhika & Others)

2019 (173) 1.wp.3150-17
Multiple consolidated writ petitions challenging liquor license cancellations and excise administrative actions affecting foreign liquor and country liquor shops in Nagpur, Bhandara, Washim and Amravati districts. Bench considered validity...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat 13 Nov 2019

Chandrashekhar Mishrilal Katakwar & Others v. State of Maharashtra (Excise Licensing Validity Challenge)

on 13 November, 2019
Multiple writ petitions by foreign liquor and country liquor licensees challenging the validity of excise licensing decisions and distance/proximity conditions prescribed by the State of Maharashtra under the Bombay Prohibition Act and Maha...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat 13 Nov 2019

Santosh S/O Shriramlal Jaiswal v. State of Maharashtra

Analysis pending · Full text available / विश्लेषण प्रलंबित
Santosh S/O Shriramlal Jaiswal vs The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. ... on 13 November, 2019 Bench: R.K.Deshpande, Milind N. Jadhav 1.wp.3150-17 (173)-Judg. 1/180 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGP...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat ★ Landmark 07 Jan 2016

Chandrapur District Liquor Dealers Association v. State of Maharashtra

License holders challenged the State's declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district effective 1 April 2015 under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. They contended that the decision was arbitrary, violative of Article 14, based on defective com...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat ★ Landmark 07 Jan 2016

Ganesh Narayan Jivtode v. State of Maharashtra

Multiple petitions challenging the State's declaration of Chandrapur district as a "dry district" effective 1 April 2015, which cancelled all liquor licenses. Petitioners (license holders and local authorities) contend the prohibition order...
Bombay High Court · Nagpur ★ Landmark 07 Jan 2016

Rajendrakumar S/O Shailendrakumar Dixit vs The State Of Maharashtra

Jt.wp1360.15
Liquor licensees and elected representatives challenged the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district, arguing the decision violates Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, lacks Chandrapur-specific data, and was based on a flawed committ...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat ★ Landmark 07 Jan 2016

Tadoba Paryatak Hotel Seva Sanghatna v. State of Maharashtra

Jt.wp1360.15
License holders and district associations challenged the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district under the Prohibition Act. The court examined the validity of the Deotale Committee Report, the data used in the decision, and whether Arti...
Bombay High Court · Principal Seat ★ Landmark 07 Jan 2016

Vijay Narayan Pallewar and Others v. State of Maharashtra

2004 (3) BCR 371; 1993 (1) Mah.L.J. 685
Liquor licensees challenged declaration of Chandrapur district as alcohol-free/dry under Section 139(1) of the Bombay Prohibition Act 1949. Held: State has authority to withdraw concessions granted under the Act and declare any district dry...
Bombay High Court · Nagpur ★ Landmark 07 Jan 2016

Vilas S/O Dharmaji Nerkar and Others vs. State of Maharashtra

2016 (1) Mah.L.J.
Liquor licensees challenge the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, on grounds of violation of Articles 14 and 21. The Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) examines the State's authority under...
Link copied to clipboard!
Ask MyExcise AI MyExcise AI