Court Judgments & Orders · न्यायालयीन निर्णय
Maharashtra State Excise case law — Supreme Court, Bombay HC, tribunals. Includes the uploaded Court Orders.
167judgments
New this week: 5
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
18 Nov 2019
Hotel Shyamshankar Bar and Restaurant v. State of Maharashtra (Consolidated Yavatmal and Akola Petitions)
Consolidated petition by 33 bar, restaurant, and country liquor licence holders challenging denial or cancellation of foreign liquor and country liquor licences by Maharashtra excise authorities in Yavatmal and Akola districts.
Ratio: Cour...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
13 Nov 2019
S.K. Pant & Others v. State of Maharashtra & Others
<UNKNOWN>
Multiple writ petitions challenging cancellation/refusal of foreign liquor (FL) and country liquor (CL) licenses by excise authorities on distance-based grounds and structural requirements. The petitioners disputed the mandatory application...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
13 Nov 2019
Smt. Seema Manoj Jaiswal And Others vs State of Maharashtra (Liquor License Distance Requirement)
Multiple writ petitions challenging cancellation/rejection of liquor licenses on grounds of non-compliance with distance requirements under excise rules. Petitioners (bar, restaurant and country liquor shop operators) challenged State's enf...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
13 Nov 2019
R.D. Wines, M/S Raman Distilleries and Others v. State of Maharashtra
Multiple alcohol license holders challenged various excise regulatory decisions affecting FL-BR, FL-III, and CL-III licenses across Nagpur, Bhandara, Washim, and Amravati districts. The court examined compliance with distance/locational res...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
11 Aug 2011
Jitendra S/O Manindranath Bose v. The State of Maharashtra
2005 (3) All MR 810
Full Bench resolved conflicting Division Bench views on whether privilege licence fees are refundable when business is stopped by court order. Held: licensee is not entitled to refund of privilege fees when prevented from carrying on busine...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
05 Jan 2010
Karan Dileep Nevatia v. The Union of India
2010 (2) AIR BOM R 18, 2010 AIH C 2844
Importer of foreign wines challenges Maharashtra notifications imposing discriminatory fees and duties on imported wines under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Court examines whether international GATT obligations override state excise pow...
Bombay High Court
· Principal Seat
★ Landmark
01 Feb 1967
B.C. Khatri v. Peshuram Chanduram and Anr.
AIR 1968 Bombay 39; (1967) 69 BOM LR 636; 1968 CRILJ 27; 1967 MAH LJ 617; ILR (1968) BOM 776
High Court upheld issuance of process against foreign liquor licensee for obtaining supplies from unapproved supplier in violation of BPA Rules. Held that private person may file complaint under BPA; at Section 202 stage, magistrate need on...