Document Type: Government Order (Suspension Reinstatement)
Reference Number: EST-5016/Proc.83(1)/RAUSU-1, dated 2 July 2016
Issued By: Government of Maharashtra, Home Department (गृह विभाग)
Effective Date: 2 July 2016
Summary: This Government Order reinstates two State Excise officers — Shri Manohar Anchuley (Superintendent, Group A) and Shri Ramesh Dhanshetti (Inspector, Group B) — to active service after their suspension was lifted. Both officers were suspended following FIR registration under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The reinstatement is conditional upon their continued subjection to ongoing court proceedings and departmental inquiry. New posting orders assign them to different excise stations.
• Two officers reinstated:
• Reason for suspension (now lifted):
• Suspension was initially imposed under:
• Conditions for reinstatement:
• Reinstatement is NOT unconditional:
• New postings after reinstatement:
• Suspension duration: Exceeded one year, triggering mandatory review under Rule 4(5)(a)
• Digital certification: Government Order published on www.maharashtra.gov.in with Reference Code 201607021815480029; digitally signed
The order references the following prior Government Orders and Resolutions:
| Reference No. | Subject | Date |
|---|---|---|
| EST-5015/Proc.45(1)/RAUSU-1 | Suspension Order (Reference 1 & 2) | 25.02.2015 |
| GAD Resolution No. NIPRAA-1111/Proc.86/11-A | General Administration Policy | 14.10.2011 |
| GAD Circular No. NIPRAA-1112/Proc.82/11-A | General Administration Circular | 20.04.2013 |
| GAD Resolution No. ABHIYO-1314/Proc.86/11-A | General Administration Policy | 31.01.2015 |
| Home Department Resolution No. EST-2715/Proc.32/RAUSU-1 | Suspension Review Committee Constitution | 23.03.2015 |
Conditions of Reinstatement:
Officers are reinstated but remain under active legal jeopardy from two sources:
No automatic exoneration: Reinstatement does NOT imply any reduction in severity of charges or guarantee of acquittal.
Financial implications: Document does not specify whether salary arrears or suspension period compensation is covered; implied that officers resume duties with full responsibility.
Mandatory review basis: Suspension exceeded one year, automatically triggering review under Maharashtra Civil Service (Suspension and Appeal) Rules, 1979.
Applicable legal framework:
Distribution of Order:
Information Copies (for records only):
This Order is issued "By and on the order of the Governor of Maharashtra" (महाराष्ट्राचे राज्यपाल यांच्या आदेशानुसार व नांवाने) and is digitally signed by the Chamber Officer, Home Department.
This is NOT an amnesty or closure — both officers face active criminal prosecution and departmental inquiry.
License implications: No indication that the suspension of these officers affects existing licenses, permits, or departmental functions during their suspension period.
Posting change is significant — Anchuley moves from presumed Mumbai office to Dhule; Dhanshetti moves to border post, possibly indicating role-specific reassignment pending case outcome.
Timeline: From FIR (19.02.2015) → Arrest (19.02.2015) → Court approval to prosecute (12.01.2016) → Departmental inquiry (21.04.2016) → Reinstatement (02.07.2016) = approximately 17 months in suspension.